By Steve Doughty

|


A London council pledged yesterday to stop moving its tenants out of the area to towns offering cheaper housing.

Labour-controlled Waltham Forest said few people wanted to leave for a new life in Walsall.

London boroughs, under severe pressure to find housing, have been encouraging residents to move out of the capital.

Waltham Forest council has been unsuccessful in moving council tenants from homes like this tower block in E11, to areas such as Walsall in the Midlands

Waltham Forest council has been unsuccessful in moving council tenants from homes like this tower block in E11, to areas such as Walsall in the Midlands

But Waltham Forest housing chief Marie Pye told the BBC: ‘The majority of people we offered this to just turned it down.

‘Most say they would rather stay on their mum’s floor so their kids could go to the same school. We need to redouble efforts to find accommodation in east London.’

The search for suitable state-subsidised housing has been made trickier because of the Coalition’s cap on housing benefit.

Jobless tenants cannot claim more than 250 to pay rent on a one-bedroom flat or 400 for a four-bedroom house. Critics claim the curbs will lead to ‘social cleansing’ of poor families.

Boroughs have been trying to persuade residents of the advantages of a move to cheaper areas.

Labour Newham has approached a housing association in Stoke-on-Trent about finding accommodation for its homeless people.

The lack of affordable housing in the borough, like this shared ownership scheme in Waltham Forest, has forced the council to try and rehouse tenants in another part of the country

The lack of affordable housing in the borough, like this shared ownership scheme in Waltham Forest, has forced the council to try and rehouse tenants in another part of the country

But Waltham Forest said people were unenthusiastic about moving to various destinations including Luton, Margate and Walsall.

Instead it pledged to look more closely at where tenants worked, where their children go to school and where family ties are when allocating housing.

Ministers have warned councils that relocation is unnecessary and may be illegal if applied to people with strong local links.

However one mother said she was happy with her move from Waltham Forest to Walsall.

‘I was living in temporary accommodation and the condition was very bad,’ she told the BBC. ‘I prefer it here. In London everything is too expensive.’



Here's what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

If the government is paying for you to live then basically I don't think you have much rights to say which town you want to live in. People are greedy. Accept the houses in Walsall or Luton and be glad you've got somewhere to live

Maybe people will just have to low their standards as those who work have to do. Like house shares. Why should people who don't work be better off than those who work hard. It appears in the UK that if your Work your will be penalized but if your turn on off the boat your be OK and looked after.

Sorry but when you are on housing benefit you need to seriously look at cheaper areas. There are lots of working people who have to pay over 1000 on annual train tickets and spend hours commuting as they cannot afford to live where they want. And adding "cleansing" is a loaded term and emotional blackmail, I don't like it.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.