London 2012 Olympics: Games will feel like Wimbledon. Just very different - Daily Telegraph
Not that the enthusiasm is unqualified. “It’s great that we are going play the Olympics here,” Rafael Nadal said. “At the same time, it’s not great that you play in a very important competition on grass over the best of three sets. That makes the tournament a little bit more crazy. The match can be decided in just a few points, so that’s probably the negative thing. There are no favourites.”
The switch from best-of-five to best-of-three (for all but the men’s finals) is just one of the changes spectators will notice. The dark green backdrop will be replaced by those jagged Olympic logos, while the all-white dress code will be scrapped. Only 12 of the 20 courts will be used, too, which will make Wimbledon feel a sparser place come Games-time.
“Personally, I don’t think tennis should be in the Olympics,” says Luke Smith, a teacher from London. “It should be the pinnacle of the sport. But in terms of access, it’s great. It gives people another chance to see the world’s best tennis players, and playing it at Wimbledon gives it a bit more cachet.”
Heather McCruden has a different perspective. She is Scottish, and like many of her compatriots, is less excited about the Olympics than she is about Wimbledon. “It’ll probably feel different,” she says. “Will they still have the same voice on the Tannoy? Will they still have Pimm’s available everywhere? I don’t know.”
Nonetheless, the faces will be the same. Of the top 20 men and women, 19 will be taking part. The grounds will be the same. Most importantly, the grass will be just as fresh as it was two days ago. So perhaps, on reflection, it will be the same Wimbledon. Just slightly different.
'Hit squad' could take over at 20 more debt-laden NHS trusts after a crisis team takes control of three London hospitals - Daily Mail
- Department of Health has identified the 20 as 'clinically and financially unsustainable'
- South London Healthcare NHS trust has gone 150million in the red over the past three years
- Many of the debts run up thanks to PFI deals agreed by Labour that will cost 2.5billion in the long term
- Departments and wards set to be closed in restructuring
- Trust is first to be put into special measures and faces being dissolved
By Matt Blake and Tim Shipman
|
Emergency treatment: Health Secretary Andrew Lansley has drafted in a crisis team to deal with problems at South London NHS Trust
Another 20 debt-laden NHS trusts could be put under special measures, it emerged today, after a crisis team took control of three London hospitals.
A squad of doctors, accountants and administrators was parachuted into South London Healthcare NHS Trust on the orders of Health Secretary Andrew Lansley after racking up debts of 1million a week.
It was the first time in NHS history that a trust has been forced hand over its administration powers to the Department of Health after failing to meet prescribed standards.
But today it emerged that the crisis could run far deeper than just one trust as it emerged there are 20 more that have been identified as 'clinically and financially unsustainable'.
They have been set goals by the Department of Health to perform better but ultimately, if they do not achieve the results, they could also face being put in special measures.
While all are in dire financial straights, many have also been told to clean up a string of performance issues which range from some of the longest waiting times in the country to alarmingly high death rates among patients.
They include Surrey and Sussex Healthcare Trust, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals Trust and Hinchingbrooke Trust, whose hospital in Cambridgeshire had historic debts of more than 40 million and became the first to be taken over in February by a private firm.
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals Trust and North Cumbria University Hospital Trust are also under the spotlight. They were among seven trusts handed a 1.5 million bailout to ease their debts earlier this year.
If any do find themselves in the place of beleaguered South London Trust, the cost to the Government could run to many billions of pounds.
Scroll down for video
In trouble: The Hinchingbrooke Hospital in Cambridgeshire Hinchingbrooke Trust had historic debts of more that 40 million
The three hospitals belonging to South London will cost 2.5billion under the long-term construction and management scheme.
It had gone 150million into the red over the past three years, largely because of crippling Private Finance Initiative deals agreed by the last Labour government.
THE 20 NHS TRUSTS IN TROUBLE
Newham University Hospital Trust
Oxford Learning Disability Trust
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals Trust
Whipps Cross University Hospital Trust
North Cumbria University Hospital Trust
North Middlesex University Hospital Trust
Surrey and Sussex Healthcare Trust
Ealing Hospital Trust
Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals Trust
Hinchingbrooke Hospital Trust
Trafford Healthcare Trust
North West London Hospitals Trust
Scarborough and North East Yorkshire Trust
Weston Area Health Trust
Winchester and Eastleigh Healthcare Trust
Great Western Ambulance Service Trust
George Eliot Hospital Trust
Dartford and Gravesham Trust
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre Trust
Suffolk Mental Health Partnership Trust
The financial chaos has already hit patient care at the hospitals – Queen Mary’s in Sidcup, Queen Elizabeth in Woolwich and the Princess Royal University Hospital in Bromley.
While services have improved in recent months, patients still face some of the longest waits for operations in the country.
One in six patients waited longer than the 18-week Government target – the worst figure for any NHS trust in London.
It also performs poorly on casualty unit waiting times, ranking 20th out of 23 trusts in the capital. Some departments and wards face closure.
The Trust took on a large debt when it was formed - mainly from the PFI that had been used for building at the Princess Royal and Queen Elizabeth hospitals.
Mr Lansley has activated an ‘unsustainable providers regime’, putting the trust under the control of a special administrator with powers to demand rapid changes.
The Health Secretary stepped in after draft financial plans showed the trust would have a deficit of 30-75million a year for the next five years.
In his letter to the trust, he wrote: ‘South London Healthcare NHS Trust faces deep and longstanding challenges, some of which are not of its own making.
'Nonetheless, there must be a point when these problems, however they have arisen, are tackled
'I appreciate that any decision to use these powers will be unsettling for staff, but I want to stress that the powers are being considered now so that patients in South East London have hospital services that have a sustainable future. This will benefit patients and bring more certainty to staff, the public and other local stakeholders.
'I am determined to improve healthcare services for patients in South East London and will take whatever difficult steps are necessary to achieve this.'
A Department of Health source said Mr Lansley was not prepared to run the risk of a repeat of the Mid Staffordshire scandal in which poor quality care and mismanagement led to the needless deaths of hundreds of patients.
Stephen Powell, chairman of the Health Select Committee, told Radio 4's Today programme that there was clearly a need for change in the face of such enormous losses.
Queen Mary's Hospital, Sidcup: A squad of doctors, accountants and administrators was parachuted into South London Healthcare NHS Trust after running up debts of 1million a week
He said there was an 'over-dependence on hospitals' and that one focus of the restructuring may be improving 'care in the community'.
The move means that, unlike loss-making companies in the private sector, the Trust will not have to pay back the money it has lost.
Mr Powell added: 'Politicians are responsible but the Secretary of State can't make all the decisions. There is a need for change.'
An administrator could now be brought in and the Trust could go bust, leading to it being dissolved and some services closed.
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woolwich: South London Healthcare NHS Trust's three hospitals will cost 2.5billion under the long-term construction and management scheme
The Department of Health said in a statement: 'The hospitals in this Trust have faced multiple problems for many years, which the previous Labour Government made worse by a merger, and the approval of two huge PFI deals that have further destabilised the Trust. The trust lost over 1 million a week last year, enough to pay for 1000 cataract operations per week, 200 hip replacements per week, or pay the salaries of 1200 nurses.
'The unsustainable providers regime was created by Labour’s Andy Burnham when he was Health Secretary. However, Labour never made use of them, preferring instead to sweep the problems facing some parts of the NHS under the carpet.
Princess Royal University Hospital, Bromley: One in six patients waited longer than the 18-week Government target - the worst figure for any NHS trust in London
'South London Healthcare NHS Trust is an exceptional case, showing most of the problems which are characteristic of “challenged” NHS Trusts. There are about two dozen sucg Trusts where the Government inherited serious longstanding problems.
'Andrew Lansley’s decision will send a strong signal to unsustainable NHS organisations that they cannot continue to provide poor services or rely on bailouts from other parts of the NHS.
'All the hospitals deemed to be unsustainable have signed agreements with the Department of Health to turn their performance around, and it is possible that the Government will consider putting some of them or others who cannot deliver sustainable services into special measures if their leadership does not make progress fast enough.
'South London Healthcare NHS Trust has previously owned up to multiple challenges including not being efficient enough, delivering low quality services, having poor contracting arrangements and having a weak board. Like the many other hospitals yet to become part of the elite NHS Foundation Trusts, the Trust faces problems which – according to the National Audit Office - "have lain unresolved for a number of years".'
Chris Ham, chief executive of health think tank the Kings Fund, warned on Radio 4's Today programme that not only other NHS Trusts, but potentially even Foundation Trusts at the very top, could go through the same thing.
He said it was important to face up to the problems, and that administrators would be able to restructure.
VIDEO: What is the future for South London Healthcare NHS Trust?...
-
TSA agent opens jar of man's ashes, spills them on the...
-
RICHARD KAY: How Kate's curtsies hurt royal reform
-
Devastated Rielle Hunter reveals she has SPLIT from John...
-
Woman, 24, 'seduced boy, 15, in tanning room as his mom...
-
Army wives strip off to show their support: Awareness...
-
Woman, 25, snaps her spinal cord and is lef paralysed after...
-
'He was found with blood and fur all over him': US man on...
-
'Rotting food, urine, and feces': Boy, 2, found locked in...
-
California couple jailed in Ghana and their biological...
-
Hilarious moment dock collapses during wedding photo...
-
How U.S. Army spent $5BILLION on 'failed' pixel...
-
Writer and director Nora Ephron dies at 71: Film icon behind...
London 2012 Olympics: with one month to go organisers are cutting things very fine - Daily Telegraph Blogs
There is one calendar month to go until the opening ceremony of the London 2012 Olympic Games and organisers are cutting the deadline very fine indeed.
Electricity for the Olympic Park is only just being turned on. The global sponsor McDonald's got the power for its worlds largest restaurant less than a week ago.
Other non-branded catering operations still don't have theirs. Spectators enjoying a cup of tea and coffee may be well down the list of Games' priorities.
The controversial wrap – really long twisting triangular strips – that will encircle and pretty the steel skeleton of the Olympic stadium is still being put in place.
Hot pink signage – in English as well as French – is dotted around the site and being hoisted up high by workers in cherry pickers.
Thousands of plants and slabs of green turf are being pulled along by tractors for workers to beautify hidden corners of the Park.
The giant broadcast screen in the middle of the River Lea is still under construction.
And this is the Olympic Park, On Time.
The biggest worry of course, is for the temporary Olympic venues which are still a maze of scaffolding and steel and littered with lime green vested workers.
The major 15,000-seat venue at Horse Guards Parade only started when the Trooping of the Colour and the Queens Diamond Jubilee celebrations were completed.
Organisers have now got permission to work well into the night and the weekend to ensure it will be delivered in time for the Games.
So too the controversial equestrian venue at Greenwich which was so bogged down by the rains in May that it required extra time consuming underpinning.
Clearly, the construction of venues amidst ever changing weather conditions remains a constant worry.
Two of the most senior men in charge of the Games, the Olympics Minister Hugh Robertson and the vice chairman of Locog Sir Keith Mills have acknowledged that while the "to-do" list is long and complex, the time line is proceeding at the pace pre-determined months ago. They both smile, yet they wring their hands at the same time.
The biggest problems surrounding the Olympics are about to converge.
The roads around London seem to be getting more congested, and will continue to do so especially from July 13 when some parts of the Olympic Lanes switch on, forcing regular traffic into car parks of chaos.
The buying of tickets on the Locog ticket website continues to be a futile effort in frustration and the communications network – always patchy in London at the best of times will be put under its sternest test in the coming weeks just as the security operation starts ramping up.
The Olympics opening ceremony is rushing forward at an ever increasing pace.
There is just 30 days to finish stadiums, sell tickets, placate motorists and commuters, convince the public there is no urgent need to text or tweet or talk and to strike a correct balance between safety and security.
Don't forget too, to flick the power switch.
London Underground workers to be balloted for industrial action - The Independent
How we all started working for free
When I was a student, back in the early nineties, I had a holiday job at the frozen-food supermarket...
London Olympics stir massive security operation, experts from US, UK unite in terror hotspot - Associated Press
LONDON (AP) -- Fighter jets thunder above the English countryside. Missiles stand ready. And Big Brother is watching like never before.
The London Olympics are no ordinary games. Not since World War II have Britain and the United States teamed up for such a massive security operation on British soil.
Hundreds of American intelligence, security and law enforcement officials are flying across the Atlantic for the games that begin July 27. Some will even be embedded with their British counterparts, sharing critical intelligence and troubleshooting potential risks. Dozens of Interpol officers will also be deployed.
The unique collaboration is rooted in common threats the partners have faced since the Sept. 11 terror attacks on the U.S. and Britain's own deadly suicide bombings in 2005.
Britain was America's closest ally in Afghanistan and Iraq, making it a prime target of Islamic terror groups. And dozens of recent terror plots, including the 2006 plot to blow up nearly a dozen trans-Atlantic airliners, have been hatched within Britain's sizeable Muslim population, more than 1 million of whom have ties to Pakistan.
Although other Olympics have taken place since 9/11 - Salt Lake City, Athens, Turin, Beijing and Vancouver - London poses a different breed of security challenge.
"I'm confident that there is more than adequate security here for these games," Louis Susman, the U.S. Ambassador to the U.K., told The Associated Press. "That said, we live in a tumultuous world, whether that be in New York or London."
Intelligence officials say there has been an expected increase in chatter among extremist groups but there are still no specific or credible threats to the London games. The terror level is labeled substantial, a notch below severe and what it has been for much of the past decade. A substantial threat level indicates that an attack is a strong possibility.
"There is a perception in some quarters that the terrorist threat to this country has evaporated," said Jonathan Evans, head of Britain's domestic spy agency of MI5. "Bin Laden is dead, al-Qaida's senior leadership in Pakistan is under serious pressure and there hasn't been a major terror attack here for seven years. (But) in back rooms and in cars and on the streets of this country, there is no shortage of individuals talking about wanting to mount terrorist attacks here."
The potential threats to the London games are broad and diverse - a lone wolf attacker such as Norway's Anders Behring Breivik who confessed to killing 77 people; a possible non-Asian Muslim convert who could slip by security with a European passport; a coordinated strike like the Sept. 11 terror attacks or a debilitating cyber-attack.
Although al-Qaida has been weakened by targeted U.S. strikes, its affiliates in places like Somalia and Yemen have stepped up their activity and increased their capabilities. They've even been working on bombs that can go undetected in airport scans.
British security officials fear that dozens of nationals who went to train in Somalia and elsewhere could eventually return.
"Terrorist problems have a long tail," said Evans. "They very rarely just stop."
Up to 1 million visitors are expected for the games, putting added strain on border security agents at airports like London's Heathrow, which has been criticized for its long lines and lack of staff to screen those arriving from other countries.
On site, some 300,000 people are expected to flow into Olympic Park in east London each day during peak times.
One of the key functions for Interpol, the international police organization, will be to speed intelligence data sharing between countries so threats can be deterred. U.K. officials scan Interpol data 130 million times per year, Interpol Secretary General Ronald K. Noble told the AP during an exclusive interview at the agency's Lyon headquarters.
"The truth is, and we know this from Norway, that you can't identify one ethnic group and say that's the ethnic group that should only concern us," Noble said. "But this Olympics - from all that I know and based on all the information that Interpol has - should be a safe Olympics."
Shared intelligence, better technology and boosted resources have allowed security officials to crack organized plots before they happen but the possibility of a self-starter extremist who operates below the radar remains one of the biggest fears.
In the case of Breivik, there were few warning signals that the self-styled anti-Muslim fanatic was about to kill 77 people last summer. The same essentially was true for Mohamed Merah, a Frenchman of Algerian descent who in March killed three paratroopers, a rabbi and three Jewish school children in southwest France.
Security officials say unless people are already known to authorities, they can go virtually undetected as they plan atrocities.
The overall security numbers are staggering. The games will be protected by some 12,000 police officers during peak times and 23,700 security staff - a number that includes some 13,500 troops on standby, which is more than the 9,500 British troops currently in Afghanistan. A no-fly zone will also be established over Olympic venues from July 14 to August 15.
More than 100,000 people have applied for jobs at Olympics venues, being vetted for employment history and possible criminal backgrounds. The more rigorous checks are done by the government for accreditation to get into the games, according to Ian Horseman Sewell with G4S, a global company providing most of the training and security staff for the Olympics.
Still, Sewell admits London is different than past games.
"London is a proven terrorist target and it is the first time the summer Olympics have been operated in a post 7/7 environment in a place that isn't a totalitarian state," Sewell said, referring to the 2005 suicide bombings in London and the 2008 Beijing games. "From a security perspective, London is breaking new ground."
G4S will also help secure venues outside of the park and protect athletes.
Some specific teams from places like Belarus, Belgium, New Zealand and Vietnam will be training in northern France to keep costs down - a move that prompted a joint Franco-British security exercise earlier this year.
Protecting athletes has been a concern since a terror attack at the 1972 Olympics in Munich killed 11 Israeli athletes and coaches.
"Israeli athletes will be staying away from the others in a more secluded area and with more security," a senior Israeli intelligence official told the AP, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of his job. "But a repetition of what happened in Munich is considered unlikely because Israel is ready and also because it isn't the kind of attack Palestinians would want now."
Technology has also advanced from past games.
Special Israeli surveillance technology has been rolled out for the Olympics across Britain, a country already known for its 4 million closed-circuit television cameras. Even more cameras have been installed at the Olympic Park.
Advanced facial and image recognition software will be used to identify suspects and connect multiple crime scenes. Cameras will be used to capture suspicious behavior. And special drones will be used for crowd surveillance, according to a salesman at an Israeli company who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the press.
And remember the movie "Speed" where a bomb would allegedly go off if a bus went slower than 50 mph (80 kph)? Hundreds of public transport vehicles and VIP buses being used in the London games have already been equipped so authorities can tell if a driver is acting erratically - something that might happen in a hijacking.
Authorities will also be able to stop a vehicle remotely or keep it going at a certain speed - technology that could be useful if a terrorist were carrying explosives and threatening to crash a bus full of athletes into a crowded venue.
The British military has already made headlines with the weapons it will have available - surface-to-air missiles, RAF Typhoon combat aircraft and an aircraft carrier docked on the Thames, the river that cuts across London close to several Olympic sites.
Security officials had worried that Irish dissidents could target the games, but those fears have dissipated.
Despite the U.S.-U.K. collaboration, there will still be differences in how the London Olympics is policed. Most of the security personnel will be unarmed - a striking difference to operations in the United States.
Adding to security issues, leaders from around the world will want to visit during the Olympics. The American delegation will be led by first lady Michelle Obama while President Barack Obama focuses on his re-election campaign.
"I've not heard any American who has said they were concerned about security here," said Susman, the ambassador. "London has made an effort to showcase London for the world and I think it's going to be terrific."
---
Ian Deitch contributed to this story from Jerusalem and Nicholas McAnally from Paris.
London's Big Ben to be renamed Elizabeth Tower - Reuters UK
LONDON |
LONDON (Reuters) - It's one of the most famous names in the world, up there with the Eiffel Tower and Statue of Liberty - but now London's Big Ben clock tower is to be renamed Elizabeth Tower to mark the queen's 60th year on the British throne.
The announcement on Tuesday followed four days of celebrations earlier this month to mark 86-year-old Queen's Elizabeth's Diamond Jubilee.
The landmark, part of Britain's Houses of Parliament, is officially called the Clock Tower but is commonly known as Big Ben, the name of the giant bell in the tower that chimes the famous bongs in the capital.
Prime Minister David Cameron welcomed the name change. "The renaming of the Clock Tower to the Elizabeth Tower is a fitting recognition of the Queen's 60 years of service. This is an exceptional tribute to an exceptional monarch," he said.
Reactions among the public were mixed, however. "Big Ben is so old and iconic, what is the sense in changing its name? All over the world people won't understand what the Elizabeth Tower is," said Romanian tourist Mara Ciortescu.
Banker Richard Labonte said: "It's not a bad idea, Ben is a strange name for a tower anyway and the Queen deserves it."
The ornate 96-metre high neo-Gothic tower features four gilded clockfaces and was completed in 1859. There are 393 steps to the top of the tower, sited on the bank of the River Thames in the heart of London's Whitehall government district.
The name change was proposed by Conservative Party lawmaker Tobias Ellwood and accepted by parliamentary authorities.
"The House of Commons (parliament) Commission welcomed the proposal to rename the Clock Tower Elizabeth Tower in recognition of Her Majesty the Queen's Diamond Jubilee and will arrange for this decision to be implemented in an appropriate manner in due course," a House of Commons spokesman said.
The jubilee celebrations underscored a surge in popularity for the Queen in recent years, and included the biggest flotilla on the Thames for more than three centuries, a star-studded concert and a horse-drawn procession through the capital.
However, many Britons were opposed to the tower name change. A YouGov poll last month found almost half opposed proposals to rename the Clock Tower, and only 30 percent supported the idea. (Reporting by Mohammed Abbas; Editing by Pravin Char)
Jenny, London, 26/6/2012 21:53... Snap! Been there, done that. So, well said. But this is the DM. Most of its readers are prejudiced idiots who won't understand a word of what you are saying, let alone get anywhere close to having the remotest chance of believing it. Be prepared for an imminent death from a shower of red arrows
- Avana Beach, London, UK, 26/6/2012 22:57
Report abuse